tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8704899696538705849.post7997038947806514213..comments2024-03-28T02:32:17.979-07:00Comments on EU Law Analysis: Posting third-country workers within the EU: the ECJ squares the circleSteve Peershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05869161329197244113noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8704899696538705849.post-77825052371572712762019-06-15T00:30:12.382-07:002019-06-15T00:30:12.382-07:00Sorry, I meant: dear Amadeo!Sorry, I meant: dear Amadeo!Christa Toblerhttps://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/staffmembers/christa-tobler#tab-1noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8704899696538705849.post-6914510945734049962019-06-15T00:28:57.751-07:002019-06-15T00:28:57.751-07:00Dear Steve,
I just read your interesting contrib...Dear Steve, <br /><br />I just read your interesting contribution. Regarding third country nationals and posting more generally, I have noted that also in Case C-168/04 (an intra-EU case, so to speak) the Court has stated that there is no harmonisation with respect to the posting of third country nationals. What does this mean with respect to Directive 96/71, which is based on the Treaty provisions on the free movement of services (note: in the EEA, it is part of the legislation on the protection of workers, which seems more logical to me). Does it apply to third-country nationals? The case law does not seem very clear to me. <br /><br />Best regards,<br /><br />Christa Tobler (Leiden University)Christa Toblerhttps://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/staffmembers/christa-tobler#tab-1noreply@blogger.com