tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8704899696538705849.post6127181316731068594..comments2024-03-29T04:53:16.437-07:00Comments on EU Law Analysis: Vorsprung durch Technik? Audi scores victory in trade mark appeal before the EU General CourtSteve Peershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05869161329197244113noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8704899696538705849.post-69809385803177469282023-03-29T00:15:42.042-07:002023-03-29T00:15:42.042-07:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Alpinebearhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05029864551629205958noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8704899696538705849.post-87309349886799607232023-03-28T22:50:18.205-07:002023-03-28T22:50:18.205-07:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Ufficiobrevettimarchihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13889937316460798382noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8704899696538705849.post-7206135552376512082022-11-11T22:54:15.141-08:002022-11-11T22:54:15.141-08:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Tom Balehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16262271034599201504noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8704899696538705849.post-65668423214482808052022-08-22T10:53:51.260-07:002022-08-22T10:53:51.260-07:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Helsikihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07103479064571682973noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8704899696538705849.post-91625419434804920132022-08-20T22:49:16.400-07:002022-08-20T22:49:16.400-07:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8704899696538705849.post-35107962480125680732019-07-31T12:46:05.321-07:002019-07-31T12:46:05.321-07:00The brand name and it's display does not cohes...The brand name and it's display does not cohesively change for any reason as compelling factor to induce favoritism upon a client of its class determining it's existence. It is well said that Audimas invention was not intended for the purpose of outlining what could as far as it has been, a member of flexible scrutiny to its class. The impression and connotation of the driven term for the branding was assumably in style for automotive supposingly.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8704899696538705849.post-19395226279661158432019-07-18T23:39:24.096-07:002019-07-18T23:39:24.096-07:00Indeed, the earlier sign was devoid of meaning. If...Indeed, the earlier sign was devoid of meaning. If only one of the signs evokes a concept, the signs are unlikely to be deemed conceptually similar. It was expressly acknowledged here that the signs at issue were conceptually different. However, this could not overcome the visual and phonetic similarities between them.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8704899696538705849.post-12251608230926863012019-07-16T08:17:05.203-07:002019-07-16T08:17:05.203-07:00I find this ruling concerning. While Audi is a ver...I find this ruling concerning. While Audi is a very well known brand, its name is essentially meaningless or in the best case having some meaning in the language that is not used anywhere in the world. Meanwhile, Audimas has a very well defined meaning and is a word often used in spoken and written Lithuanian language. It's an emotional reaction from my side for sure but then what makes probably brands such as Audio-Technica can dispute the trademark for the word Audi as well if they wish so.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com