tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8704899696538705849.post4057091364596094612..comments2024-03-28T02:32:17.979-07:00Comments on EU Law Analysis: Anonymity in CJEU cases: the Court changes its approachSteve Peershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05869161329197244113noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8704899696538705849.post-15108833746537889212023-01-30T06:12:56.802-08:002023-01-30T06:12:56.802-08:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.cameronhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16700682194198692121noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8704899696538705849.post-71514512531502548332023-01-29T10:47:48.564-08:002023-01-29T10:47:48.564-08:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Sophia. Isabella.https://www.blogger.com/profile/11424742867701923062noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8704899696538705849.post-57922758075221602092023-01-24T02:32:44.441-08:002023-01-24T02:32:44.441-08:00100% correct. It is an extremist interpretation of...100% correct. It is an extremist interpretation of GDPR... It is of public interest to know who were the physical persons involved in cases except if they ask for anonymity in front of their national judge and for valid reasons... <br />All Academics should resist this nonsense...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com